WhatsApp, Center receives notice of the objection to lower user privacy standards

Written by admin

The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Center and WhatsApp to respond to a new legal basis claiming lower privacy standards for Indians than European consumers, saying the judiciary’s duty is to protect citizens’ privacy.

“People have serious fears that they will lose their privacy, and it is our duty to protect them,” the Supreme Court said.

“You may be two or three trillion companies, but people value privacy more than money,” he told a court headed by Chief Justice Bobde. WhatsApp although he tried to claim that Europe has special data protection laws that India does not have.

The Court of Appeal sent a notice to the Government and Facebookown application on an interim application submitted by Karmanya Singh Sareen in a pending petition from 2017.

Senior lawyer Sham Divan, who spoke for the petitioner, said the messaging app applied lower privacy standards to Indians and was banned from sharing data with Facebook.

The court noted: “We are impressed by Mr Divan’s argument that a data protection law was proposed before us.

“You will now share data with Indians on this policy.”

Senior lawyer Kapil Sibal, who participates in WhatsApp, said that Europe has a special law (General Data Protection Regulation) and he will follow the law if Parliament makes such a law.

The bench, which also includes Judges AS Bopana and V Ramasubramanyan, said citizens were very concerned about the loss of their privacy and felt that their data and chats were being shared with others and should be investigated.

The center told the apex court that social media apps cannot share user data and the data must be protected.

The petitioner challenged the privacy policy, claiming that there is huge metadata of users that is shared for profit.

In 2017, the Supreme Court raised the issue of WhatsApp’s privacy policy to a constitutional bench, saying it addressed the larger issue of privacy and the right to personal liberty.

The appeal, lodged at the Court of Appeal by Karmanya Singh Sareen and Shreya Sethi, challenged the Delhi Supreme Court’s ruling on the grounds that no relief had been granted for data shared by consumers after 25 September 2016 and 19 (Freedom of speech and expression) and 21 (Right to life) of the Constitution.

Can Realme X7 Pro take over OnePlus Nord? We discussed this on Orbital, our weekly technology podcast, which you can subscribe to via Apple Podcasts,, Google Podcasts, or RSS,, download the episodeor just press the play button below.



Leave a Comment

%d bloggers like this: