As SSDs come close to becoming the default (and only) storage option for desktops as well as laptops, the market is filling up with more affordable models. Even M.2 NVMe SSDs, which started as exotic and expensive options aimed only at enthusiasts, are now extremely common. As well as being faster than older SATA SSDs, they are small, convenient, and save you the hassle of extra wires hanging around the inside of your computer. There is clearly a market for first-tier NVMe SSDs today, and Kingston is aiming for just that with its new NV series.
Kingston NV1 SSD price India
The Kingston NV1 SSD is equivalent to based on SATA A and UV series in terms of positioning. It is available with a capacity of 500GB, 1TB and 2TB and it is interesting to see that no lower capacities are offered, although this is an entry-level model. Retail prices for SSDs usually have nothing to do with the numbers printed on the labels, and also often vary. In India, the former two are easily for sale for around Rs. 5499 and Rs. Respectively 9,499, while the 2TB version is not as widely available and will cost around Rs. 24,500, which is not so attractive in terms of GB costs.
The simplified carton states that the NV1 is 35 times faster than a rotating hard drive, which is not a high bandwidth to achieve an SSD. You receive a code to request a free copy of Acronis True Image HD, but it is printed on the inside of the cardboard sandwich. It’s almost impossible not to miss unless you already know it’s there, and in fact many people are very likely to tear it while opening the package, as there are no indications that something important is inside. The software allows you to clone or display a device, but does not support incremental backups, scheduling, cloud or mobile backups, etc., such as the retail versions of True Image.
Kingston NV1 SSD features and specifications
Kingston does not make exclusive performance claims for the NV1, but instead simply strives to provide high capacity at low prices. What’s most remarkable about this SSD series, according to trusted source AnandTechis that Kingston does not specify exactly what controller you will receive or even what type of flash memory – to balance costs and inventory, the company can replace components in different batches and the only guarantees you have are that they will meet the declared performance for performance and durability.
Other companies have been found component exchange after the release of the SSD (and the publication of reviews) without saying anything, and although Kingston was not very loud and clear that he wanted to do the same when he advertised NV1, he was at least in advance with the media that reported about this fact .
This, of course, makes it difficult to review a product, as you may end up with something significantly different if you make your purchase a month or two below, and there is no guarantee that the review unit sent to Gadgets 360 will even match what is on the market at the moment. That said, Kingston is a well-known and trusted brand and that alone is enough for many buyers. If you don’t care about TLC versus QLC flash and controller bandwidth and if you find the required capacity at a good price, you should be satisfied.
Kingston claims 2100MBps sequential read and 1700MBps sequential write for all three capacities. This SSD uses PCIe 3.0, not the faster, newer 4.0 standard. Durability is estimated at 120TBW, 240TBW and 480TBW for capacities of 500GB, 1TB and 2TB respectively. MTBF (average time between failures) is 1.5 million hours. All these figures are well below that KC2500 from Kingstonintroduced earlier this year, offers. Even the previous first-level NVMe model, the A2000, offers significantly better endurance ratings.
It was not possible to identify the specific type of controller and flash on my scanner unit without peeling off the label covering the actual chips of the module and Kingston did not publish these details. Some third-party reports suggest that lower-capacity devices will use TLC flash, while higher-end devices will use QLC flash, but this may change at any time. We can’t check the bandwidth of the controller, but we can safely assume that there is no DRAM cache. The official specification sheet also does not mention encryption. We will only have to rely on performance to evaluate this device.
Kingston NV1 is a very basic SSD and therefore not available with a heat sink. The board itself is bright blue and looks nice enough, but you won’t see much of it once it’s installed. As this is a single-sided M.2 module and is only 2.1 mm thick, it will fit in tight spaces such as ultra-thin laptops.
Kingston NV1 SSD performance.
Kingston NV1 was compared on an open platform consisting of >>>>. All Windows updates and drivers are the latest releases during this review. Windows reported the formatted capacity of the device as 465.76 GB.
Starting with CrystalDiskMark 6, we saw sequential read and write speeds of 2,553MBps and 1,959MBps, respectively, which are much higher than I expected based on the official specifications. This can be a built-in cushion so that future revisions remain within the declared performance threshold. Random readings and records were measured at 1370.6MBps and 1447.4MBps, which is not bad at all. This is much faster than today’s premium SATA SSD like Samsung SSD 870 Evobut behind the impressive Kingston KC2500.
The Anvil benchmark reported reading and writing scores of 4,674.33 and 6,827.63, respectively, for a total of 11,501.96. In the real Windows test for copying files using an 80GB folder of different files, the write speed touched 345MBps and remained quite stable at around this level with very large files, but dropped to 15MBps with various small files.
It is worth noting that even the latest version of Kingston’s own software SSD Manager, downloaded from its website, has not found this device. Could not display diagnostic information or any security related options.
Questions remain about the long-term viability of the Kingston NV1. I wouldn’t use this as a boot device on my main desktop or store my most important data on it without a solid backup plan, but that doesn’t mean no one else should choose it. This would be a great cheap upgrade for an older computer or laptop that caters to non-critical needs, and can also be a very good secondary or tertiary device for saving large folders to install games, as they will benefit from fast loading. .
What makes it the most attractive is its low price, but there are other models that are more affordable and have unambiguous specifications, especially the Crucial P1 and WD Blue SN550. Kingston’s own A2000 costs only Rs. Another 100-200. Given that this model is relatively new to the Indian market, I hope to see much better prices in a few months. This SSD effectively creates a new, lower level of product, so with the right pricing it can certainly create a niche for itself.
However, the performance is quite good and the durability should be sufficient for most cases of using low-impact home and office computers. You will save a lot of money compared to something common such as Kingston KC2500 or Samsung SSD 970 Evo Plus.
500 GB: Rs. 5499
1TB: Rs. 9 499
2TB: Rs. 24 500
- Good overall performance
- Relatively affordable
- Basic specifications are subject to change
- Disappointing endurance ratings
- No encryption
- No management software
Ratings (from 5)
- Execution: 4
- Value for money: 3.5
- Total: 3.5