On Monday, the ICC dismissed allegations by news channel Al Jazeera that India’s test matches against England (2016) and Australia (2017) were fixed, saying the passes from the game, defined as fixed, were completely predictable and therefore “implausible as a correction “.
Al Jazeera in a documentary – “Cricket’s Match Fixers” – released in 2018, claims that India’s game against England in Chennai in 2016 and that against Australia in 2017 in Ranchi are fixed.
The International Cricket Council (ICC) also acquitted five people – filmed by the channel – of any wrongdoing, even when they behaved in a suspicious manner, but there was no credible evidence to accuse them.
During the program, alleged bookmaker Aneel Munnawar was spotted claiming his dubious connections and match-fixing history, including two tests. They grow kohliIndian team.
The ICC has launched an investigation into the claims.
“The program claims that two matches were recorded: India against England in Chennai in 2016 and India against Australia in Ranchi in 2017. In order to assess whether the game breaks highlighted in the program were unusual in any way, The ICC has engaged four independent betting cricket specialists to analyze the claims, “ICC said in a statement after completing its investigation.
“All four concluded that the excerpts from the game identified in the program as allegedly fixed were completely predictable and therefore implausible as a correction,” the statement added.
The ICC did not name the acquitted, but sources said they included former Pakistani cricketer Hassan Raza, Sri Lanka’s Taranga Indika and Tarindu Mendis. They had joined the investigation conducted by the world governing body.
While the small first-class cricketer in Mumbai was also filmed, he did not join the investigations.
“No charges will be filed under the ICC Anti-Corruption Code against any of the five participants in the code included in the program due to insufficiently reliable and credible evidence,” the ICC said.
The ICC’s overall investigation focuses on three main areas: the claims made by the program, the suspects who were part of it, and how the program gathered evidence.
“In the case of the claims broadcast in this program, there are major weaknesses in each of the areas we investigate that make the allegations unlikely and credible, a view confirmed by four independent experts,” GM (Integrity Unit) Alex Marshall was quoted as saying. to state in the communication.
“Based on the program, the participants in the code, who were filmed, appear to have behaved in a dubious manner, but we have not been able to assess the full context of the conversations that took place beyond what was seen on the screen. participants actually happened.
“This, combined with the lack of other credible evidence, means that there are not enough grounds to bring charges under the ICC’s Anti-Corruption Code,” Marshall said.